The Prime Minister Is a Liar

We already know that Hon. Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of Australia, is a crooked liar.  Today, St. George’s Day, 2GB’s Ben Fordham publicly confirmed on his radio show that the statement he made in March, when interviewing the PM, that she is being investigated by Victoria Police, for alleged fraud, is true.  Naturally, our mendaciloquent PM denies everything.

Si noscat mendaciloquam, oderit Julia Gillard
et nostram haec ministram illam prima nefaria primam.

(“If she knew our mendacious prime minister
even base Julia Gillard would hate her.”)

Listen to Ben Fordham’s statement on April 23, 2013.

Listen to Ben Fordham’s  interview with Hon. Julia Gillard on 7 March, 2013.

Remember, the PM has already lied in Parliament:

Ms GILLARD (Lalor—Prime Minister) (14:48):  I have in fact dealt with these questions on the public record.  I stand by those truthful statements, and the construction that the Deputy Leader of the Opposition is trying to put on them is not a fair construction.  I refer her to my extensive press conference, where I dealt with all of these issues in a great deal of detail.

Neither she nor her Canberra press lackeys referred to the power of attorney in the transcript which her own office released. By saying she “dealt with these questions on the public record”—specifically, the power of attorney which she “witnessed” as well as the mortgage wherewith it was secured—she willfully misled the House.

UPDATE:  see Michael Smith’s “Deny, Deny, Deny.  True to form and entirely unbelievable”.
Of course, ABC News fails—yet again—to mention this important story.

UPDATE II:  see Grace Collier’s “Diary” in The Spectator of 2 March 2013:

Hedley [Thomas] and I have both written about the ‘AWU scandal’.  Some weeks ago I sent the following question to the PM’s office after speaking with the police:  ‘I am asserting that the PM is a subject of a police enquiry.  I believe the investigation was initiated in response to an allegation made against the PM, specifically that she created a false document … I am wanting to know whether the PM is aware the investigation is into whether this allegation is correct and if so whether she intends to comply.  By comply I mean respond to any police requests for interview that may be made.’  And the PM’s response:  ‘The investigation into this matter has been known for some time.  As the Prime Minister has repeatedly made clear, she was not involved in any wrongdoing.  The investigation is a matter for the police.’
The Prime Minister hasn’t denied my assertion that she is a subject of a police enquiry, nor have the Victorian Police corrected it.  It strikes me as ironic that a Prime Minister whose primary impairment is a lack of trust from the electorate may soon be interviewed by the Fraud Squad over her rôle in a major crime.

UPDATE III:  a song:

She’s a Liar

Have we an obligation to listen to our leaders with respect?
Are honour and integrity virtues we may rightfully expect?
Listen to the PM; there is never any honour to detect:
    she’s a liar.

That woman must equivocate, ever fabricating through each day,
she’s misrepresenting and deceitfully inventing all the way;
misleading, misinforming, the truth is something she will never say:
    she’s a liar.

It aint so complicated that she’s prevaricated to us all;
perfidious, mendacious, duplicitous in matters great and small,
simply put she tells untruth, accordingly we have to make this call:
    she’s a liar.

See also “Unfit to Lead” and “The PM Lied”. 

UPDATE IV:  Andrew Bolt joins in the fun with “Claim: Police investigating Gillard on slush fund”.

UPDATE V:  see “PM denies AWU investigation claims”, by Steve Lewis and Carly Lawrence:

Victorian police are escalating their investigation into the union scandal involving Julia Gillard's former boyfriend, engaging forensic accountants to track hundreds of thousands of dollars in allegedly suspect payments.

As detectives continue to interview key witnesses in the Australian Workers Union slush fund scandal, Ms Gillard yesterday denied claims from a Sydney radio host that she was being investigated by police over the affair.  […]

“The police are interested in comments made by Julia Gillard in the interview with me,” Mr Fordham told his listeners.

Mr Fordham told listeners he knew “for a fact that the Prime Minister is being investigated” by the Victorian police.

But a spokesman for Ms Gillard said the PM has “never been contacted by police and never been asked to provide a statement”.

Well, I imagine that, sometimes, people may be investigated by the police without their being informed, and even without being asked for a statement, until police have completed other investigations and obtained relevant documents.  We need not pay very much attention to any typically equivocatory denial from the PM or anything which her lying lackeys assert.

UPDATE VI (24 April):  shortly after midnight, mirabile dictu, I could find no reference to Fordham’s claim in either the Sydney Morning Herald or The Age.

UPDATE VII:  see “Gillard denies new AWU request”, in The Australian, by Hedley Thomas and Pia Akerman:

A former union employee who has told of depositing $5,000 into Julia Gillard’s bank account at the direction of her allegedly corrupt union boss boyfriend has been asked by Victoria Police to make a formal statement as part of an ongoing fraud investigation.

The request came as the Prime Minister denied allegations made by radio broadcaster 2GB’s Ben Fordham that she was under direct investigation.

Ms Gillard has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to the money.
Fordham said Victoria Police had verified to him that she was being investigated and asked him to make a statement about responses Ms Gillard gave in a March 7 radio interview about her conduct in an alleged fraud involving several hundred thousand dollars in the early 1990s.
The Australian is aware that detectives have questioned more than 12 witnesses since late last year who had direct knowledge of the Australian Workers Union slush fund scandal, the role of Ms Gillard at law firm Slater & Gordon and admissions by former AWU official Ralph Blewitt that he helped perpetrate a major fraud at the union.

UPDATE VIII:  some previous posts:

“Gillard’s End is Nigh” (19 January, 2013);
“Once is Happenstance …” (19 November, 2012);
“One Obvious Wrongdoing is the Misprision” (16 November);

“‘Τετέλεσται’”  (23 August, 2012);
“Yet More on Gillard” (22 August, 2012);
“‘Young and Naïve’ and ‘the Benefit of the Doubt’” (21 August, 2012);
“More on Gillard” (20 August, 2012);

“‘Depart, I Say, and Let Us Have Done with You’” (21 July, 2012);

“The PM’s Distress” (22 June, 2012);

“The PM’s Gag” (10 February, 2012);

“Incredibly Challenging” (10 November, 2011);

“The Loathing of Julia Gillard” (22 September, 2011);
“The National Interest” (20 September, 2011);
“The Elocution of Julia Gillard” (18 September, 2011);
“Principium Exitus” (31 August, 2011);
“Another Story You May Not Read” (includes a Statutory Declaration by Robert Kernohan, 29 August, 2011);
“A Story You May Not Read” (29 August, 2011);

“The PM and the People Agree” (4 July, 2011);
“The Wisdom of Julia Gillard” (at The Friends of CO₂, 26 June, 2011); and
“She’s a Woman” (at Say “Yes’’ to More Taxes, 17 July, 2010).

UPDATE IX (27 April):  see “Who knows PM Julia Gillard is under investigation?”, by Hedley Thomas, in The Australian:

In the days after a heated 2GB radio interview in March, during which Julia Gillard was questioned closely about the AWU slush fund scandal, a detective in Victoria’s Fraud Squad, Ross Mitchell, made a strategic decision.
One answer the Prime Minister gave during a dogged tussle in her interview with Ben Fordham stood out.  Mitchell knew it when he heard it.  The other detectives knew it too.
Although seemingly innocuous to those not involved in the probe, Gillard’s answer was new and pivotal.  It meant police in Melbourne would need a sworn statement from Fordham in Sydney, even though as a journalist he would be expected to subsequently disclose some key facts.
The actions that Mitchell and other police took in seeking further information from Fordham led to him stating in unequivocal terms on his radio show this week something that had been previously cryptically and very carefully inferred—the Prime Minister is under formal Victoria Police investigation as a result of the 18-year-old Australian Workers Union fraud.  Fordham has kept a pledge to police to not publicly reveal more than this.  […]
Neither the Police Commissioner of Victoria, Ken Lay, nor the Prime Minister’s office has sought to dispute any of Fordham’s assertions.  Nor is the PM’s office now suggesting, as it did in March, that the Victoria Police investigation has nothing to do with Gillard.  The reality is that Gillard’s office cannot know the details of the probe.
Lay, who has had the opportunity to correct the record if he decided that Fordham had jumped to a wrong conclusion in naming Gillard, let it stand.  […]
For an alleged fraud being taken seriously since late last year by seasoned detectives, Australians should ask hard questions about why large sections of their media, and particularly the public broadcaster, still baulk at reporting the AWU scandal; downplay the story or, worse, self-censor; ask few or no questions; and even mock journalists who have lost their jobs for pursuing it—Michael Smith and Glenn Milne.
Australia’s best-resourced media outlet, the ABC, has scarcely, if at all, reported the ongoing police investigation this year. Only after Media Watch questioned the ABC’s obvious reticence to look at the AWU story in any meaningful way last year, the 7.30 program belatedly weighed in.  […]
For Mitchell's taskforce, one of the most interesting features of [Ralph] Blewitt’s story is that he has told it in the knowledge that he faces going to prison. Having admitted to police an incriminating role in what he calls a fraud, Blewitt can be prosecuted and convicted. There has been no deal.
One of the planks of Blewitt’s story, which 2GB’s Fordham latched on to in his interview with the Prime Minister in March, concerns a “power of attorney” document bearing Gillar’'s signature as the official witness.  According to Blewitt, it was a false document.
Blewitt has repeatedly said the “power of attorney” was not worth the paper on which it was written.  The document permitted Wilson to buy the Fitzroy terrace house (in Blewitt's name) at auction.  Blewitt, who was living in Perth at the time, claims it is bogus—that Gillard could not have “witnessed” it as they were thousands of kilometres apart at the time.
In previous rejections of Blewitt's claims about this document, the Prime Minister insisted she always witnessed such documents properly as a solicitor.  But Fordham tells Inquirer that all of Gillard’s previous answers seemed to avoid declaring outright that she and Blewitt were in the same room when the power of attorney was witnessed.
“I wanted a straight answer from the PM on that simple question when I interviewed her in March and I wasn’t going to let it go,” he said.
Gillard finally confirmed [i.e., asserted] to Fordham that she and Blewitt were in the room when the document was signed. It is an assertion that could only be [proven] wrong if Victoria Police have evidence placing them on opposite sides of Australia.

UPDATE X (27 April):  the supposed “specific power of attorney” (note the lack of a second witness):

A “specific power of attorney” differs from an “enduring power of attorney” but, nonetheless, see the Western Australian Office of the Public Advocate’s helpful advice on an “Enduring Power of Attorney”; the “Enduring Power of Attorney Information Kit” (p. 15) suggests:

When you sign your enduring power of attorney form, your signature must be witnessed by two people.

Both witnesses must:

   • be present when you sign the form

   • be 18 years of age or older

   • have full legal capacity

At least one of your witnesses must be a person authorised to witness statutory declarations under the Oaths, Affidavits and Statutory Declarations Act 2005 (see Appendix B).  You may choose to have two authorised witnesses, but this is not essential.

The person who is not an authorised witness must not be a party to the enduring power of attorney (i.e. a witness cannot be a sole, joint or substitute attorney or a person involved in a marksman or readover clause in the enduring power of attorney).

It is however also recommended that the authorised witness is not a party to the enduring power of attorney, and can be seen as an independent witness.

I doubt that many reasonable people, knowing of Julia Gillard’s relationship with Bruce Wilson, would contend that she was “an independent witness”.
Victoria also requires two witnesses; see the Victorian Office of the Public Advocate’s helpful advice in “Take Control—A kit for making powers of attorney and guardianship” (p. 41):

The two witnesses must sign the ‘Certificate of witnesses’.  You cannot be a witness and neither can your attorney.  At least one of the witnesses must be someone who is not related to you or the person(s) you appoint as your attorney(s).  One of the witnesses must be authorised by law to witness the signing of statutory declarations.

When Ben Fordham asked the PM whether she were in the same room as Mr. Blewitt when she supposedly witnessed the “specific power of attorney”, she replied:  

I properly witness documents as a lawyer.  So you can believe Mr Blewitt or you can believe me, Ben.  I’m not overly fussed what you conclude, but I witnessed documents properly as a lawyer.  […]
I’ve witnessed documents properly as a lawyer.  […]
I don’t remember each document, but I witnessed documents properly.  […] 
I witness documents properly.  […] 
I witness documents properly.  […] 
my practice as a lawyer was to witness documents properly.

I should hope that a qualified solicitor, in order to witness a document properly, would ascertain that the said document was drafted with a reasonable level of competence and that the proper number of suitable witnesses were present.
Section 106 of the Victorian Instruments Act (1958), which Julia Gillard, who was practising as a solicitor in Victoria, should have known, is:

Execution of powers of attorney

(1)  An instrument creating a power of attorney may be executed by, or by direction and in the presence of, the donor of the power.
(2)  Where such an instrument is executed by a person by direction and in the presence of the donor of the power, two other persons shall be present as witnesses and shall attest the instrument.

UPDATE X (29 April):  see Michael Smith on “The Power of Attorney, the document that Julia Gillard says she witnessed properly”.

UPDATE XI (2 May):  

A Vision

I dreamed our prime deceiver,
arrested by “the man”;
protested, “I’m your leader!”
as they put her in the van.

She feigned a stout denial,
and claimed she was naïve;
the jury at her trial,
though, ignored her make-believe.

Once in gaol she might spend years
considering her fall;
may her shame—at last!—and tears
be a lesson for us all. 


The Latest Scheme

Accounts aren’t robust;
Gillard says new taxes could
stop things going bust.

In her greedy lust
for pelf, she feigns some care, but
can’t hide her disgust

for crippled kids thrust
near her.  Remember:  all her
pledges are as dust.

People surely must
consider how well Gillard
last set up a trust.

UPDATE XII (10 May):  a reminder of the PM’s supposed position on telling the truth when she was in opposition; on October 5, 2005, Julia Gillard said in the House of Representatives:

The Labor Party is the party of truth-telling. When we go out into the electorate and make promises, do you know what we would do in government?  We would keep them.

When we say them, we mean them.  That is the difference between [the then Coalition Government] and us.  If I were Minister for Health it would be my duty to implement lock, stock and barrel—word for word—exactly what we had promised in the election campaign.

Ha!


UPDATE XIII (16 May):

Sunt lacrimae rerum

Introducing a
new Bill, Julia Gillard
chokes up, weeps and cries

“Disabled people
will be supported quite soon!”
As ever, she lies:

in a few weeks, a
small trial will commence; the
main scheme will take years

to begin.  Gillard
has, for many, caused much pain
without any tears.

UPDATE XIV (17 June):  see “Victoria Police seize files on AWU”, by Hedley Thomas of The Australian:

Police from the Victorian Fraud Squad have seized boxes of legal documents from Julia Gillard’s former employer, Slater & Gordon lawyers, as part of an ongoing probe into the AWU slush fund scandal.
The documents were removed from the firm’s Melbourne offices after the execution of a search warrant and co-operation between the firm and detectives, sources told The Australian yesterday.
Fraud Squad detectives want to examine all legal files related to controversial legal work done by Ms Gillard and the firm for her then boyfriend, Bruce Wilson, the allegedly corrupt Australian Workers Union senior official, and his union sidekick, Ralph Blewitt, in the 1990s.  […]
Mr Wilson and Ms Gillard, whose relationship ended [according to her] over the AWU scandal in 1995, have repeatedly and strenuously denied any wrongdoing, and accused Mr Blewitt of being unreliable and a liar.
It is understood that while Mr Blewitt wants police to examine all AWU-related legal documents held by Slater & Gordon, Mr Wilson will seek to prevent police from examining the files that are relevant to him.  […]
Victoria Police, which has had a taskforce of detectives working on the AWU investigation since late 2012, have repeatedly declined to comment on their most sensitive probe.  Police last month sought documents from the archives of the AWU’s West Australian and Victorian branches, in which Mr Wilson and Mr Blewitt worked in the 1990s during the alleged fraud.
The legal work done at Slater & Gordon for the two men includes the Prime Minister’s role in helping Mr Wilson establish the AWU Workplace Reform Association.
Ms Gillard says she provided legal advice to help set up the AWU Workplace Reform Association, which Mr Wilson later used to carry out the alleged fraud.  She later described the association as a “slush fund” for the re-election of union officials, but said she had no knowledge of its operations.
The slush fund was used by Mr Wilson and Mr Blewitt to bill building company, Thiess, for hundreds of thousands of dollars for work that was not performed.
The union was not aware of the existence of the slush fund.  Slater & Gordon was the law firm for the AWU at the time.
Money was withdrawn from the slush fund to purchase a $230,000 Fitzroy terrace house in Mr Blewitt’s name at a 1993 auction Ms Gillard attended with Mr Wilson, who subsequently lived in the property.  Slater & Gordon handled the conveyancing and helped provide finance.

UPDATE XV (18 June):  see “Police seek approval to use documents”, by Mark Baker of The Age:

Victoria Police will seek to use documents taken from prominent law firm Slater & Gordon in framing potential criminal charges over the Australian Workers Union slush fund scandal.
Fraud squad detectives are expected to appear before a Melbourne magistrate within two weeks to obtain approval to use documents seized under warrant last month from the firm.  […]
The investigation focuses on the 1993 purchase of a Fitzroy house involving some of the hundreds of thousands of dollars allegedly misappropriated from the AWU Workplace Reform Association by former senior AWU official Bruce Wilson, who was then the boyfriend of Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Ms Gillard, then a partner at Slater & Gordon, gave legal advice in relation to establishing the association—ostensibly for promoting work safety and training—which she later confirmed to be a “slush fund” to bankroll union elections.
She later created a power of attorney to enable Mr Wilson to buy the property in Kerr Street, Fitzroy, in the name of union crony Ralph Blewitt.
Mr Blewitt has confirmed in a statement to police that he was involved in fraud but both Ms Gillard and Mr Wilson have vehemently denied any illegal or improper conduct.
Detectives are believed to have removed two boxes of documents from the La Trobe Street head offices of Slater & Gordon, including one labelled “Wilson”.  […]
Mr Blewitt, who says he did not sign the Wilson power of attorney until after the property was purchased and that he never benefited from the deal, has already publicly waived client privilege over his dealings with Slater & Gordon.  […]
A team involving as many as 12 detectives has worked on the AWU investigation since late last year.
It is believed they have interviewed more than 60 people including former employees of Slater & Gordon who have provided important leads.
Sources said it was unlikely any charges would be laid before the election, but this was due to the complexity of the investigation rather than any desire to avoid embarrassing the government.

UPDATE XVI (13 June, 2014):  at the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption, Bruce Wilson claimed that Ralph Blewitt did indeed sign the supposed Specific Power of Attorney on 4 February, 1993:

More Labor Sleaze

Lying Down on the Job
 
Perhaps Albo had
misheard the PM when she
said, “Stay on message!”

and misunderstood
her “happy endings” speech, too.
Is this a presage

of things to come?  Most
in the Cabinet, clearly,
are scarcely imbued

with great intellect
but, along with the country,
are thoroughly screwed.

Small Asian hands!  Anthony Albanese enjoying a brief,  vertical massage.

The Appropriate Sobriquet

The nickname’s easy:
Anthony Albanese
truly is Sleazy.

Is Gillard queasy?
No, her grins remain cheesy;
her hands still greasy.


Gillard’s Typical Double Standard
 
The PM must pout
whilst continuing to tout
her unseemly clout.

Why won’t she “call out”

misogyny from a lout?
She’s so quick to shout

that Abbott’s devout

and, therefore, will always flout

whatever she’ll spout.

I have little doubt,

in the next election bout,
there’ll be quite a rout.

The PM’s own picture of a serial abuser and a radio host.

Hon. Anthony Albanese—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, and Regional Development and Local Government—, frequents, it seems, shonky massage parlours.  Ay, there’s the rub.*  See Michael Smith’s “Anthony Albanese and his dangerously poor judgement”.

Hon. Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of Australia, famously shrieked that she’d “call out misogyny” whenever she encountered it; however, though she continues to attack the Leader of the Opposition for such overtly misogynistic behaviour as glancing at his wristwatch during some of her shrill ranting, she gladly consorts publicly with people such as the vile Kyle Sandilands, a proven abuser of vulnerable women and girls.

*  Perhaps the minister seeks a soothing massage in order to soliloquise: 

     To be or not to be a minister….
     To lie, perchance to cream; aye, there’s the rub,
     for in this lying down, what creams may come,
     when we are shuffled off with massage oil. … 

UPDATE I (26 March):  at Catallaxy, in response to a comment asserting that Anthony Albanese’s private affairs “should have no bearing on politics”, I wrote:

It has a great bearing on politics if compromising photographs of Albanese were used to stop his standing for deputy leader.  It has a great bearing on politics if workers in that parlour were here on 457 visas.  It has a great bearing on politics if any worker therein be underage.  It has a great bearing on politics if any worker therein entered this country unlawfully.  It has a great bearing on politics if our corrupt PM has managed to cling to power by using a giant dirt file.  It has a great bearing on politics if our hypocritical PM […] exculpates any fault, wrongdoing, slip or crime, if committed by someone whose vote she requires.
I don’t know whether any of these suppositions be at all likely; accordingly, I’d like this matter to be investigated properly.

UPDATE II (26 March):  see “It’s Always a Happy Ending for Albo” by Will Dallas Brooks:

Now, visiting a massage parlour is not illegal in New South Wales; nor is engaging the services of a sex-worker at a brothel.  If it [be] on his own dime and time, we have no problem with that.
But let’s not kid ourselves:  prostitution is not a victimless crime, regardless of whether it [be] illegal or not. The majority of brothel workers are engaged in sex-work not out of choice, but cold necessity:  they offer their bodies because they are unable to get another job, or because they are addicted to drugs or gambling, or because they are damaged, psychologically, from sexual, physical or emotional abuse.  Many are forced into it, and others see it as the only way to make enough money to escape their existing lives.   […]
So for the Manager of Government Business in the Australian Federal Government, whose Prime Minister has said “I will call out misogyny wherever, and whenever, I see it” and making the current election about “strong feminism” versus “prurient sexism”, to be involved in such a tawdry affair is, quite honestly, as dumb as a sack of hammers.

UPDATE III (1 May):  see “A Prejudicial Press”, by Larry Pickering:

What if one of Tony Abbott’s front benchers, and Leader of Opposition Business in the House, [were] caught in a Thai brothel in his own electorate?  Mmmm, can you imagine the uproar?
Well, Christopher Pyne’s opposite number in Government, Anthony Albanese, was caught doing exactly that.  Not a murmur from the Press, no questions for Mr Albanese, not even a hint of concern or interest. 

UPDATE IV (7 August):

Our Compliant ABC Sees Nothing

One Coalition
MP errs and the outrage
runs off the scales,

but the ABC—

obliged to report the news—

altogether fails

to mention Albo was
seen in a pub with Thommo
having a few ales:

they discussed, no doubt,
massages, slush funds, deals and
many sordid tales.

They should have counted
how many Labor MPs
might soon be in gaols.

UPDATE V (19 September):  above, I predicted “there’ll be quite a rout”; there was (though the ALP removed Julia Gillard as PM to “save the furniture”, replacing her with the allegedly more popular, previous PM, Kevin Rudd):  the coalition’s seats in the House of Representatives increased from 73 to 90, and the ALP’s number of seats declined from 72 to 55.

Gillard’s End is Nigh

Finally, we can soon expect to see our duplicitous prime minister forced to provide proper answers to questions relating to her crooked past.  More details are forthcoming.

See Michael Smith’s “I was delighted to be able to share my happiness with you yesterday afternoon”.

See also Exposing the Truth behind the Woman. 

UPDATE I (23 January):  listen to “We will be OK, we are good enough to work out who’s done right and who’s done wrong”, wherein Michael Smith explains that he has “one hundred per cent confidence” that “the wheels are in motion” to bring the corrupt crooks of the AWU/Gillard-gate scandal to justice.

UPDATE II (24 January):  see “Police extend AWU slush fund inquiry”, by Mark Baker, in the SMH:

Victorian detectives have expanded their investigation into the purchase of a Fitzroy house with union slush fund money controlled by the disgraced former boyfriend of Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
A former legal secretary at law firm Slater & Gordon who handled conveyancing work on the purchase in 1993 is believed to have provided significant new information during an extensive interview with police earlier this month.
Part of the investigation is believed to involve a power of attorney document prepared and witnessed by Ms Gillard—then a salaried partner at Slater & Gordon—that her boyfriend and senior Australian Workers Union official Bruce Wilson used to buy the house in the name of union crony Ralph Blewitt.  […] 
Olive Palmer, the legal secretary who managed the conveyancing work for the Fitzroy house purchase and a mortgage through a Slater & Gordon loan facility, met detectives in Melbourne earlier this month.
One of the investigating detectives later flew to Queensland and conducted interviews with Ms Palmer, formerly known as Olive Brosnahan, at her Sunshine Coast home.
The power of attorney document drafted and witnessed by Ms Gillard that Mr Wilson used to buy the Fitzroy property in Mr Blewitt’s name was dated February 4, 1993.
But a note in the conveyancing file handwritten by Ms Brosnahan and addressed to Ms Gillard on February 16 says: “We need P/A or certified copy”.
Mr Blewitt claimed last year that he had not seen the document prior to the auction and that Mr Wilson had later brought it to him for signature in Perth, where he was AWU state secretary.  […]
It is believed the Victorian fraud squad is also liaising with its counterpart in Western Australia.

UPDATE III (24 January):  see Larry Pickering’s “Vic Police Close In on Gillard”, wherein he suggests that detectives “are on the brink of laying charges in the AWU Wilson/Gillard fraud case” and “two major law firms should expect raids within days”; he quotes a “reliable source”:

“We expect to have this all wrapped up in a few weeks, hopefully no later than March, and there will be people charged.
“We are treating this matter extremely seriously and no stone will be unturned in ensuring the alleged culprits face justice.”
There was no indication given as to who would be charged but the level of urgency and thoroughness indicated to me (and I say indicated) there is little doubt Julia Gillard is viewed as a major player and very much a person of interest.

UPDATE IV (3 February): 

UPDATE V (13 February):  Larry Pickering provides his tenth instalment of “Our Prime Minister Is a Crook” (sometimes varied as “Is Our Prime Minister a Crook?”):

For the first time in Australia’s history we are now witnessing a sitting Prime Minister seeking re-election while under investigation by a major fraud squad.  The Left of the Press still shows no interest.  […]
A mountain of evidence involves central character Gillard and a comprehensive prima facie case will shortly be dumped on the desk of the Public Prosecutor.
Fraud squads do not react to innuendo, rumour or smear, only evidence and the diligence and confidence it has exhibited so far suggest charges are imminent.  […]
The Press insists, nonchalantly, that the Victorian Fraud Squad is boringly investigating a range of people.  That is incorrect.
Evidence has been taken from a range of people but there is only one person of interest, there is only one person a complaint has been levelled against, there is only one person under investigation, and that’s Julia Eileen Gillard.
The Fraud Squad has implied they are thrilled with their progress and hopes to have its case wrapped up in weeks. […]
I’m no detective but if I had the massive resources of a professional fraud squad and had interviewed all persons of interest and corroborating parties including past employees of Slater & Gordon, I would certainly feel confident I had sufficient evidence against Gillard to put her away for a lengthy period.
Whether that happen or not is problematic.  But Gillard is certainly under investigation right now and should resign.
If she is charged she will be forced to resign.  She is not a Craig Thomson who can rely on the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ principle.
She will not be permitted by her own party to sully the Office more than she already has.

The Government’s Lackey

On Listening for the First and Last Time to Jon Faine*

I’d never heard in all my days
such foul, pathetic, pathic praise,
and hope I never hear again
agagic moans from fervid Faine.

When Gillard calls, Faine’s one of those
who swiftly bend to touch their toes;
but critics he must mock and smear,
calumniate and domineer.

A proctoleichous poodle, he
conceals corruption willfully.
One fact, however, Faine can’t hide:
that Gillard, with aforethought, lied.

*  Jon Faine, an oleaginously partisan presenter in Melbourne for ABC Radio, is known, according to the ABC, “for his quick wit and willingness to ask the stickiest of questions”—except when his interlocutors are federal ministers or awarmist lunatics whom he must coddle and obsequiously defend.

For those with strong stomachs, go to Michael Smith’s “Jon Faine of ABC Local Radio Melbourne was my gracious host on the radio today”.

UPDATE I:  see “Jon Faine Doubles Down”, by Prof. Bunyip:

it is a good thing Jon Faine found paid work as a toady on ABC Radio 774, rather than remaining with the law, because a compulsion to connect dots is generally regarded as an asset amongst learned friends.  Faine, whose preciousness needs to be valued in carats, displayed none of that this morning, despite the oft-thwarted attempts of Michael Smith and The Age’s Mark Baker.  Each attempted to address the increasingly insistent question of our Prime Minister’s fitness to hold the highest elected office in the land, and neither could get a word in edgeways.
Smith was seldom allowed to finish a sentence and, when he did, his point was engulfed by the shill’s interruptions and poo-hooing.

UPDATE II:  the correct link for Jon Faine’s monologue (briefly interspersed with comments from Michael Smith) is http://blogs.abc.net.au/files/hectic-half-hour-23-11-12.mp3.

UPDATE III (24 November):  from the ABC’s Code of Practice 2011 (pp. 4-6): 

UPDATE IV (24 November):  see “Their ABC”, by Roger Franklin:

At about the same time Fairfax Editor at Large Mark Baker began looking into the “young and naïve” Julia Gillard’s past as a salaried partner at Slater & Gordon it should have been obvious to even the most blinkered eye that many questions about our Prime Minister remain to be answered.  Without stretching a point, The Age and Sydney Morning Herald have long been little more than house organs for the left, so a senior editorial executive’s decision to shrug off his incurious colleagues’ inertia and disdain, roll up his sleeves and begin digging came as a welcome change.  When even Fairfax catches the whiff of something rotten, then there must surely be more substantial than an olfactory phantasm of the conservative imagination.

There is, however, one place where the instinct to spin and belittle, to denigrate and dismiss, remains vigorous as ever, and that is the Southbank studio in Melbourne where ABC Radio’s Jon Faine puts on a show most weekday mornings.  His performance on Friday was a beaut, representing in less than 30 minutes, at least to this listener, not only the abrogation of a public broadcaster’s obligation to wield the straight bat, but also, and more to the point, why the ABC is seriously overdue for a very stiff dose of reform.  If and when the Coalition assumes the government benches, let Faine’s histrionics be Exhibit A.

UPDATE V (1 September, 2013):  I—along with many others, I reckon—lodged a complaint with the ABC, asking why it would provide “this contumelious, inept hack [i.e., Faine] with both a large salary and airtime?” and “Why do you allow such unprofessional bias?” I have not yet received an official response to my complaint, but the ABC has conceded that Faine must fain apologise for his unprofessional failure to act according to the ABC’s charter.  See Michael Smith’s posts here and here.